Democracy is not a just system in our world today.
- Jeanine
- Nov 24, 2024
- 2 min read
I believe that democracy is not a just system in our world today. At the same time, democracy is often known as the most "fair" and "just" form of governance, it is far from perfect, especially in a world with inequality, corruption, and systemic biases. Even the so-called "best" example of democracy—the United States—shows flaws that reveal the limits of this system.
In the U.S., democratic ideals like "one person, one vote" are often undermined. The Electoral College, for instance, allows presidential candidates to win elections despite losing the popular vote, which brings down the power of individual votes in heavily populated states, which was evident in the Trump v H. Clinton elections. Additionally, voter suppression tactics, such as strict voter ID laws and gerrymandering(when people in charge of drawing voting maps (like how districts are divided for elections) make the shapes of those areas unfair), disproportionately affect excluded communities, making the system
inherently unequal. Wealth and corporate influence also play a major role in American politics, where campaign financing creates a system where the interests of the wealthy often outweigh those of the average citizen. These examples illustrate how even in a democracy, power is not truly distributed
equally.
On the other hand, the Western world has long demonized systems like communism, portraying it as inherently oppressive and unjust. While many communist regimes have failed due to corruption and authoritarian practices, the idea of collectivism and shared resources have pros in theory, especially in
addressing wealth inequality—a major flaw in many democratic countries. However, these alternative systems are rarely given credit because they challenge the dominant capitalist narrative portrayed by democratic governments, particularly in the West.
The truth is, no system—democracy, communism, socialism, or any other—is completely just or fair. Democracy assumes that all citizens have equal access to resources, education, and information to make informed decisions, which is rarely the case. Moreover, democracies often fail to protect minority rights
when the majority holds oppressive views, leading to what is often called the "tyranny of the majority."
While other systems have their flaws, they sometimes address issues democracy overlooks. For example, socialist policies in Scandinavian countries have shown success in reducing wealth inequality and providing universal health care and education. These aspects highlight that fairness isn't exclusive to
democracy and that alternative systems can achieve justice in ways democracy struggles to. In conclusion, democracy is not inherently just because it operates within an unjust world. It is shaped by the same inequalities and power dynamics that exist in any form of governance. While it remains one of the more popular systems, we must critically evaluate its flaws and remain open to learning from other systems instead of dismissing them outright.
Works Cited:
I agree, socialist countries can be good, such as the Scandinavian ones you mentioned. I think Libya is another good example.